Compounded vs brand-name, with the trade stated
Last verified 2026-08-24 · methodology · conflict-of-interest disclosure · dataset: open JSON
Side by side
| Brand (Wegovy / Zepbound) | Compounded (sema / tirz) | |
|---|---|---|
| FDA approval of the product | Yes | No — not FDA-reviewed |
| Evidence | STEP/SURMOUNT tested this product | Molecule-level; trial file doesn’t transfer |
| Form | Prefilled pens; manufacturer vials | Multi-dose vial + syringe; concentration varies by pharmacy |
| Legal basis | NDA-approved product | §503A patient-specific prescription, documented clinical need |
| Cash price on file | $349 ongoing, $199 first fill (NovoCare) / $299–$449 conditional (LillyDirect) — verified 2026-08-25 | $69 / $97 — verified floors |
| Where it wins | Coverage, device simplicity, approval status | Self-pay budgets, flat-dose pricing, access |
Who should pick brand
Anyone with coverage or savings-card eligibility — a copay beats every cash number on this site. Anyone for whom “FDA-approved” is a requirement rather than a preference. Anyone who wants the pen instead of vial-and-syringe mechanics.
Who compounded actually fits
Cash payers priced out of $199–$499/month — the $69 verified floor is the difference between treatment and no treatment for a lot of budgets — provided the pharmacy checks out (the checklist) and the not-approved trade is accepted with open eyes, not buried in footnotes. The 2025 wind-down ended mass 503B compounding; patient-specific 503A compounding for documented need is the lane that remains — details on the legality explainer.
Update log
- 2026-08-24 — Page created per the Pass-12 audit; sources inline.